Step by Step Guide: 
Setting up of automated 
ci-cd pipelines across 
hybrid and multi-cloud 
environments 

Running workloads across AWS, Azure, GCP, and on-premises infrastructure is a reasonable engineering decision. Each provider has strengths, and organizations should use them. But the moment that decision is made, the CI CD Pipelines on Multi Cloud becomes a cross-cloud coordination problem, and most teams underestimate what that actually requires.

It's not enough to have a pipeline that deploys to multiple targets or production environments. The pipeline needs to manage credentials across identity systems that were never designed to integrate cleanly. It must apply the same security standards across clouds that use different tools and configuration models. And it must keep environments aligned, so that, for instance, when a build passes in GCP staging, there is real confidence it will behave the same way in Azure production. All of this has to happen without relying on manual checks or without a human in the loop for routine releases.

Multi-cloud automation at this level is achievable. But it requires a deliberate design. This is a step-by-step guide on how to build it.

9 Step-Guide to Setting Up CI/CD Pipelines on Hybrid and Multi-Cloud Environments

Step 1: Map Workloads to Environments Before Picking Any Tool

The most common mistake in CI CD Pipelines on Multi Cloud projects is choosing tools before defining the architecture. That gets expensive fast.

Start by defining how workloads are distributed and why. Determine which systems run in which environments and the reasoning behind it. Application compute may operate in AWS, enterprise integrations in Azure, data and machine learning workloads in GCP, and regulated systems on-premises. Then clarify how changes move between environments. What defines development, staging, and production? What triggers a promotion from one stage to the next? Is it automatic, approval-based, or policy-driven?

When workload boundaries and promotion rules are clearly defined, automation follows a predictable path.

Step 2: Establish a Centralized Source Control System

Before any CI/CD pipeline is configured, all application code, infrastructure scripts, and configuration files need to live in one place. So then a unified Version Control System (VCS) becomes the single source of truth for the entire multi cloud automation setup. Without this, different teams working across different cloud environments end up with diverging codebases, inconsistent configs, and no reliable baseline to deploy from.

Branching strategy matters for automation in multi-cloud too. For instance, GitFlow, with dedicated branches for features, releases, and hotfixes, provides a structured path for managing how changes move from development through staging to production across different cloud targets.

Changes to infrastructure code should go through the same branching and review process as application code. The entire delivery system, from application logic to modules, should be version-controlled and auditable from a single repository.

Step 3: Choose Orchestration That Does Not Belong to Any One Cloud

The orchestration layer must be cloud-agnostic. Using a provider-native CI/CD tool as the core of a multi-cloud pipeline builds vendor dependency and defeats the purpose of having a multi-cloud strategy in the first place. Some strong options for CI-CD pipelines on hybrid cloud and multi-cloud setups:

• GitLab CI/CD supports multi-environment runner targeting. Runners are tagged per environment — AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premises — and jobs route to the right infrastructure automatically.
• GitHub Actions with self-hosted runners works well for hybrid setups. Private workloads stay behind the firewall; the Actions control plane manages orchestration without requiring those workloads to be publicly reachable.
• AWS CodePipeline is AWS's native fully managed CI/CD service that automates build, test, and deploy stages whenever code changes. While provider-native, it integrates well with third-party tools and is a practical choice for organizations whose workloads are heavily AWS-weighted and need tight integration with services like CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, and ECS.
• Jenkins remains the default for large enterprises with established on-premises infrastructure. Its plugin ecosystem covers virtually every toolchain combination in use.
• Bamboo integrates tightly with Atlassian's ecosystem; Jira and Bitbucket in particular are making it a practical choice for teams that already operate within that stack and need CI/CD to stay connected to project and code management workflows.
• Azure Pipelines is part of the Azure DevOps suite and provides continuous integration and delivery across any language, platform, and cloud. It supports parallel jobs, multi-stage pipelines, and deployment to Kubernetes, virtual machines, and serverless targets. It is well-suited for enterprises already operating within the Microsoft ecosystem.
• Google Cloud Build is a fully managed build service on GCP that imports source code from repositories, executes builds in containerized environments, and produces deployable artifacts. It integrates directly with GKE, Artifact Registry, and Cloud Deploy, enabling end-to-end pipeline automation within the Google Cloud ecosystem.
• Terraform uses declarative configuration to provision and manage infrastructure across AWS, Azure, GCP, and on-premises environments as code. In a CI/CD context, it handles environment provisioning as part of the pipeline itself. Now this ensures that every target environment is consistent, reproducible, and version-controlled before deployment runs.
• Ansible automates configuration management, application deployment, and post-provisioning setup using agentless, human-readable playbooks. It sits naturally in the deployment stage of a pipeline, handling the configuration steps between infrastructure provisioning and application delivery across hybrid and multi-cloud targets.
• SaltStack handles large-scale infrastructure automation and configuration management using an event-driven architecture. It is particularly suited to environments where real-time orchestration across a high number of nodes is required and integrates into CI/CD pipelines to manage state and configuration.

The right combination depends on existing toolchain and team familiarity. The principle is consistent: a cloud-agnostic pipeline layer should have no preference for which cloud it targets.

Step 4: Provision Infrastructure Consistently Using Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC)

Inconsistent environments are the root cause of most deployment failures in multi-cloud setups. If the AWS staging cluster behaves differently from the Azure staging cluster, there are high possibilities that tests that passed in one place might fail in the other. It is important to note that multi-cloud automation only works if the environment themselves are reproducible.

The approach that scales: modular configuration files per environment and provider, workspaces or stacks to separate dev, staging, and production without duplicating code. And also, remote state storage with locking enabled across all providers.

All Infrastructure as Code (IaC) modules should also be version-controlled and reviewed with the same rigor as the application code, as mentioned above. Beyond provisioning, automated drift detection should be enabled to ensure live resources remain aligned with configurations in version control. When infrastructure drifts without detection, it can create the exact environment inconsistency that makes multi-cloud CI/CD pipelines unpredictable.

Step 5: Containerize Applications for Cross-Cloud Portability

Containerization is what makes CI-CD pipelines on hybrid cloud and cross-cloud delivery realistic.

Docker containers package an application together with its runtime and dependencies, so it runs the same way regardless of the underlying cloud. This type of consistency is critical in hybrid and multi-cloud setups. Let’s say, a microservice built and tested in one environment can run in another without code changes, reducing the environment’s mismatch issues. This often appears when moving between private and public clouds. Or say an image built once and stored in a registry such as Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, or Google Artifact Registry can be deployed to any Kubernetes cluster without modification.

Kubernetes orchestration also provides a consistent runtime layer across providers, while Helm (a powerful package manager for Kubernetes) keeps environment-specific configuration separate through values files. This makes deployments cleaner and rollbacks predictable. In multi-cluster environments where services communicate across clouds, a service mesh further enables mutual TLS, traffic control, and observability at the infrastructure level, without requiring changes to application code.

Together, these practices strengthen portability and stability in CI/CD pipelines on multi cloud and hybrid cloud environments.

Step 6: Build the CI/CD Pipeline Stages

With infrastructure provisioned and applications containerized, the pipeline logic can be structured. A well-designed pipeline for CI/CD automation on multi-cloud environments runs through these stages in sequence:

1. Source trigger: The pipeline begins with a code push or pull request merge. Branch rules determine which environments are targeted, feature branches deploy to dev clusters; then merges to main trigger staging and, conditionally, production.
2. Build and continuous integration: The CI system compiles code, resolves dependencies, and produces a container image. Unit and integration tests run in parallel inside temporary cloud environments that are created for the test runs, and removed immediately after. This prevents residual state from affecting results and keeps feedback cycles short. Dependency layer caching further reduces rebuild time and keeps CI-CD pipeline performance predictable.
3. Security scanning: SAST and DAST run automatically within the pipeline. Container images are scanned for known vulnerabilities before they are eligible for deployment. Let's say if a policy threshold is exceeded, the pipeline stops. No image progresses further until the issue is addressed.
4. Artifact storage: Verified images are tagged with version and environment identifiers and pushed to the registry. Every artifact reaching a deployment environment should be traceable to a specific commit and pipeline run.
5. Environment-specific deployment: Deployment jobs target environments using defined runner tags or controlled environment variables. Helm charts standardize application deployment across Kubernetes clusters, regardless of cloud provider. Controlled release strategies such as blue-green deployments enable zero-downtime transitions, while canary releases expose changes to a limited percentage of live traffic before full rollout. These patterns reduce operational risk and provide measurable validation before broad exposure.
6. Post-deployment validation. Automated health checks run immediately after deployment. Application metrics, readiness probes, and service availability indicators are evaluated against predefined thresholds. Failure triggers automatic rollback. The pipeline does not wait for a human to notice something is wrong.

Step 7: Centralize Secrets Management

Secrets management is underestimated in single-cloud setups and genuinely risky in multi-cloud ones. Managing AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, and GCP Secret Manager separately, while operating a unified CI/CD pipeline creates inconsistent access policies and dispersed audit trails. Over time, that makes it harder to maintain clear oversight of who accessed what, and when.

A centralized secrets layer brings consistency back into the system. Rather than hardcoding credentials into pipeline configs or environment variables, Vault injects them into runners at runtime using short-lived tokens. Access exists only for the duration of the job and expires immediately after it is completed. This type of approach is what limits exposure, if credentials are compromised, and ensures every secret access is logged and traceable.

Step 8: Build Unified Observability Across All Environments

Monitoring across multiple clouds often stays tied to each provider. AWS workloads are tracked in CloudWatch, Azure services in Azure Monitor, and GCP resources in Cloud Operations. When a deployment fails across environments, switching between these tools slows investigation and extends production impact.

A consolidated stack using Prometheus and Grafana for metrics, combined with the ELK Stack for centralized log aggregation, provides a single interface across all environments. Cloud-native tools continue collecting infrastructure-level data, which then feeds into this shared layer for correlation and alerting. This same view should track DORA metrics: deployment frequency, lead time for changes, change failure rate, and time to recover. Together, these four metrics offer a clear, quantitative view of pipeline health across the multi-cloud ecosystems and highlight bottlenecks that provider-specific dashboards often miss.

Step 9: Enforce Governance Through Policy-as-Code

Pipelines that deploy across multiple clouds without manual review must rely on automated policy enforcement. Policy-as-code frameworks such as OPA Gatekeeper define compliance rules directly within the deployment workflow and evaluate them at runtime. Resources that violate those rules, such as unencrypted storage buckets, misconfigured network policies, or containers pulling from unauthorized registries, are blocked before provisioning, better than being discovered later during an audit.

Policy definitions remain versioned and reviewable in source control, creating a documented history of governance standards and changes. And this record becomes part of the organization’s audit evidence. Which is almost a practical requirement for DevSecOps maturity in CI-CD pipelines on hybrid cloud and multi-cloud environments.

Cloud4C: For CI/CD Automation Solutions on Hybrid and Multi-Cloud Setups

Achieving this level of multi-cloud automation is rarely a DIY project for the enterprise. It requires a partner, an expert in disciplined implementation, continuous oversight, and ownership of the entire CI/CD control layer.

With Cloud4C's expertise in CI/CD pipeline automation, organizations bridge the gap between development, operations, and security. The scope of our services covers the full pipeline lifecycle: toolchain integration, environment provisioning, container orchestration across AWS EKS, Azure AKS, and GCP GKE. With IaC-driven infrastructure management through Terraform and Ansible, and GitOps-based deployment. Cloud4C operates across AWS, Azure, GCP, IBM Cloud, Oracle Cloud, and on-premises infrastructure under a single managed SLA. Which means a unified accountability model for the enterprises, rather than separate vendor relationships for every environment.

Security and governance are also built into the delivery model. Cloud4C's DevSecOps practice integrates SAST and DAST scanning, container image vulnerability assessment, secrets management, RBAC configuration, and policy-as-code enforcement directly into pipelines. Continuous compliance monitoring then supports PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, and SOC 2. Cloud4C also holds expertise in cloud migration and modernization, AIOps-powered managed security through the Self-Healing Operations Platform (SHOP), multi-cloud cost optimization, and end-to-end DevSecOps consulting.

Your enterprise gets a complete operational foundation with Cloud4C. Contact us to know more. 

Frequently Asked Questions: